Search Results for "Dispute Application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Dispute Application"

19796 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19796 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition Under Section 482 CrPC for DV Act Proceedings, Holding Inherent Powers Not Available for Civil Proceedings. The Court ruled that proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are civil in nature, and thus Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked to quash them.

18 Jul 2023

The applicants, who are family members of the respondent's husband, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Speaking Order. Settlement Commission's order set aside for failing to consider submissions and provide reasons, remanded for fresh consideration.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioners, M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. and its employees, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Settlement Commission, Cu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trade Secret Misappropriation Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Nasal Spray NOXGUARD. Confidentiality Agreement Did Not Cover Information Allegedly Misused; Appellant Failed to Establish That Respondents Used Its Confidential Information.

30 Nov 2022

The Appellant, SaNOtize Research and Development Corp., a Canadian corporation, filed a Commercial Appeal against an order dated 21st October 2021 dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Pending Suit Despite Delay — Limitation Not Applicable to Abatement Set-Aside Application Under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC. The court held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not govern applications under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC and that sufficient cause for delay must be liberally construed to advance substantial justice.

1 Jun 2021

The case arises from a civil suit for permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased) against the original defendant (since dece...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Discharge Order in Private Complaint Case — Reiterates That Magistrate Must Apply Judicial Mind at Stage of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC. Sessions Court Cannot Discharge Accused Without Considering Magistrate's Order and Material on Record.

18 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Shivaji Ananda Pawar, filed a private complaint against several accused, including respondent nos. 1 and 2 (original accused nos. 5 an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Restoration Application in Civil Appeal — Delay Not Sufficiently Explained. The Court held that the Appellants failed to show sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as the explanation for the 96-day delay in filing the restoration application was unsatisfactory.

28 Mar 2005

The Appellants, Dattaram Keshav Aroskar and others, filed an appeal from order (Appeal from Order No.78 of 2005) in the Bombay High Court challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail Application in Anticipatory Bail Case — Regular Bail Granted by Sessions Court Upheld Despite Procedural Irregularity. The High Court set aside the Magistrate's order sending accused to police custody and directed regular bail to be decided on merits.

29 Mar 2005

The applicant, Balkrishna Dhondu Raul, filed a criminal application challenging the orders of the Sessions Court, Raigad at Alibag dated 8th February ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT Order Rejecting Rectification Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Runs from Receipt of Order Under Rule 34A of ITAT Rules, 1963. The Court held that the six-month period under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for filing a rectification application runs from the date of receipt of the order, not the date of the order, because the applicant must file a certified copy of the order under Rule 34A read with Rule 9 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

1 Dec 2025

The Petitioner, Accost Media LLP, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 13 October 2025 passed by the Income T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Plaint Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit.

26 Feb 2016

The applicant, original defendant No.1 in S.C.S. No.5055/2012, filed a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate in Testamentary Matter — No Caveat Filed, No Caveatable Interest Shown. Court holds that a person who has not filed a caveat and has no caveatable interest cannot seek revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

14 Dec 2016

The case pertains to a petition for revocation of probate filed by Radhika Bhargava and others (petitioners) against Arjun Sahgal and others (responde...

113 114 115 116 117

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)