Search Results for "substantial implementation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1168 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Injunction in Land Allotment Dispute Involving Cooperative Housing Society. Notice of Motion Seeks to Restrain Creation of Third Party Rights Over ~23 Acres Prime Land in Versova, Mumbai.

7 Oct 2014

The judgment text provided only includes the introductory paragraphs outlining the nature of the dispute and the relief sought, without the court's an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Partnership Dispute. The Court considered whether to appoint a sole arbitrator for disputes arising from a partnership deed containing multiple arbitration clauses.

28 Aug 2014

The applicants, Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. and Bharat Barrel And Drum Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., filed two arbitration applications under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

8 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Opinion of Adjudicating Authority Under FEMA for Failure to Supply Documents and Provide Reasons. The Court Directs That All Documents Referred to in the Complaint Must Be Furnished and That the Opinion Under Rule 4 of the Adjudication Rules Must Be a Reasoned Order.

6 Feb 2014

The writ petition was filed by Lalit Kumar Modi, a former Vice President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Chairman of the India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Split Bench Delivers Dissenting Opinion on Bar Council Election Rules Validity; Dissenting Judge Holds Rules 6(h) and 32(g) Intra Vires Advocates Act. The dissenting opinion concluded that the impugned election rules did not violate Sections 3(2)(b), 3(4) and 49(1)(a) of the Advocates Act, 1961.

13 Dec 2006

This matter concerned two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the validity of certain rules of the Bar Council of Maharashtr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, adjudicates appeal against order in a suit for specific performance of contract for sale of agricultural land by a public trust. The appeal concerns the validity of an order rejecting an application to restrain a bank from auctioning the land pending the suit.

29 Nov 2006

...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4995 OF 2006.

20 Sep 2006

Background: The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by thirteen petitioners who claimed to be elected members of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Demands Under Bombay Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1953; Considers Whether Onshore Offices of an Offshore Mining Company Are Commercial Establishments. Issues involved interpretation of 'commercial establishment' under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, and 'employee' and 'establishment' under the Labour Welfare Fund Act, along with challenges to exemption rejection and retrospective demand.

19 Jul 2006

The Bombay High Court was seized of a writ petition filed by Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (the petitioner), a Government company incorporat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Notification Restricting Construction Near Protected Monuments. Court Holds Rules Framed under Section 38 of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 Are Intra Vires, but Does Not Decide Validity of Notification in Available Text.

5 Jul 2006

The High Court of Bombay heard four writ petitions together concerning the validity of a notification dated 16.6.1992 issued under the Ancient Monumen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Petitions Challenging RBI and Central Government Actions Under Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Interim Stay Granted Against Amalgamation. Court Finds Prima Facie Haste and Lack of Propriety in Decision-Making Process Leading to Status Quo Ante Restoration.

5 Apr 2006

The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging actions taken by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Central Gover...

112 113 114 115 116

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)