Search Results for "landlord's claim"

1403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Revenue Appeal Order and Demolition Notice — Mutation Entry Restored. The court held that the Land Revenue Code does not empower revenue authorities to order demolition and that mutation entries are presumptive evidence of possession, not title.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners and in possession of property surveyed under no.128/10 of Cavellosim Village, filed an application before the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Mining Rejects Dumping Suit. Limitation and Jurisdiction Objections Not Decided at Preliminary Stage Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC as Plaint Disclosed Continuing Cause of Action and Civil Court Jurisdiction.

The respondent, Gurudas G. Pai, filed Special Civil Suit No.34/2011/A before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim, against the petitioner, Ms. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds trial and appellate court decrees granting 1/3rd share to plaintiffs in joint family property, rejecting defendants' claim of prior partition.

The present regular second appeal was filed by defendants No.1 to 6 (appellants) under Order XLII Rule 1 read with Section 100 of the Code of Civil Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...