Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition challenging Show Cause Notice for input tax credit reversal due to non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 caused by GST portal functionality issues.

The Bombay High Court quashed the show cause notice issued to Tikona Infinet Private Limited, which alleged wrongful availing of ITC due to non-electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Appeal — No Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual terms is final and not open to reappraisal in appeal unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

The case involves two connected commercial appeals arising from an arbitral dispute between Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. (ARCIL) and Many...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...