Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5220 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5220 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Forest Land Dispute Due to Denial of Adequate Opportunity and Procedural Errors. The Court set aside lower court judgments and remanded the matter for fresh trial, emphasizing the need to admit additional survey evidence and consider resurvey renumbering under the Forest Regulation and Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

20 Sep 2022

The dispute centered on land in village Chikkasanne within Bhuvanahalli State Forest area. The State of Karnataka appealed against the High Court's di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Held that Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the suit is within limitation and discloses a cause of action.

16 Jul 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendant No. 11, Lily Realty Private Limited, in a suit for specific performance and injunction. The pl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Applicable. The court held that the DRT erred in rejecting the refund application without considering Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, which provides for refund when a case becomes infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of CPC Application in Eviction Appeal Under Karnataka Public Premises Act. CPC Provisions Not Applicable to Summary Proceedings Under Section 10 of the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1974.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, T.V. Sathyanarayana Gupta, was an alleged unauthorized occupant of a shop in a municipal complex in Pavagada Town, Tumakuru District. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Holds Regular First Appeal Not Maintainable Against Wakf Tribunal Decision Under Section 83(9) of Wakf Act, 1995 — Appeal Permitted to Be Converted into Civil Revision Petition. The Court ruled that the only remedy against a Tribunal decision is revisional jurisdiction, not an appeal under CPC.

30 Mar 2015

The appellants, defendants before the Wakf Tribunal, filed a Regular First Appeal under Order 41 Rule 3 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Proc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.

16 Aug 2019

The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Marking of Registered Sale Deeds Despite Denial of Contents in Civil Suit — Evidentiary Value of Documents with Identification Number Clarified. The court held that marking a document with an identification number is a procedural step and does not amount to proof of its contents; the trial court erred in refusing to mark the sale deeds.

2 Apr 2026

The petitioner, as plaintiff in Regular Civil Suit No.41 of 2012, sought a declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction against the respondent/de...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Appeals from Single Judge's Interim Orders in Share Control Dispute. Appeals Concern Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Injunctions, and Corporate Governance Interim Measures.

1 Sep 2010

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard four appeals arising from a common order dated 26-03-2003 passed by a Single Judge in two suits concernin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Certificate Under Section 24 of Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 is Evidence of Transfer, Not Certificate of Title. The court held that a certificate under Section 24 is merely evidence of transfer and does not confer title, thus the suit for possession without challenging the consolidation order was maintainable.

19 Sep 2019

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court arising from a civil suit for possession of agricultural land. The appellant (original ...

112 113 114 115 116

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)