Search Results for "family requirement"

4123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Valuation Based on Book Value as Per Partnership Deed. Clause-11 of Partnership Deed Mandates Asset Valuation on Book Value Basis, Not Market Value, Under Section 48 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

The case involves two appeals filed by Dr. Vijaypat Singhania and others (Appeal No. 361 of 2010) and Dr. Gaur Hari Singhania and others (Appeal No. 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enhancement of Maintenance to Wife Under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. Family Court's Order Enhancing Maintenance from Rs.3000 to Rs.8000 per Month Upheld as Not Perverse.

The petitioner, Prakash S. Randive, challenged the order dated 21 January 2016 of the Family Court, Mumbai, which enhanced the maintenance payable to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Karta's Power to Alienate HUF Property for Legal Necessity in Civil Appeal Against High Court's Decree of Partition. Legal Necessity Includes Marriage Expenses of Daughters; Alienation for Value Binds Coparceners if Necessity Proved.

The dispute pertained to alienation of joint Hindu family property by its Karta. Plaintiff, one of the sons of the Karta, challenged a sale deed execu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Bombay Rent Act, Stays Execution Till Death of Widow Tenant. Court Holds Landlord's Need for Additional Accommodation Bonafide and Reasonable, Not Requiring Dire Necessity Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

The petitioner-landlord filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...