Search Results for "default dismissal"

1908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Ocular Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Mangesh Sadanand Masane and Sadanand Namdev Masane (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Father-Son Duo in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Sakharam, a 20-year-old man, who was in a love affair with Jyotsna, the daughter of appellant No.1 (Laxman) and sis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Mazhar s/o Shaikh Haidar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Sessions Trial No.23 of 2013 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Ajay Keshav @ Kiran Malekar for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(i) of the Indian Penal Code and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that the appellant failed to prove the mortgage and refusal to redeem, and no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Gulabrao Vishwas Desai, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court against the judgment and order dated 3rd August 1988 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...