Search Results for "Temple Dispute"

1433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Restoration of Suit Case — Defendant No.1 Succeeds in Setting Aside Appellate Decree. First Appellate Court Erred in Reversing Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence and Limitation Issues.

The case involves a Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed by Defendant No.1 against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2019 passed in R.A.No.03/2009 by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in BDA Allotment Dispute — Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Non-Registration of Agreement. Single Judge's Order Quashing Allotment Set Aside as Allottee Had Paid Full Consideration and Possession Was Delivered.

The case involves two writ appeals arising from a single judge's order in WP No.11179/2020 dated 21.06.2022. The appellant in WA No.593/2024, Sri Ravi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge or Intent. Court holds that mere involvement in a road accident without evidence of rash or negligent driving does not attract Section 304 Part II IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kolla Bhovi, was the driver of a lorry involved in a road accident on 20.01.2013, resulting in the death of a cyclist. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Sale Notice by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Available. Cooperative Bank is a 'Bank' Under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Can Initiate Proceedings Under the Act.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Sri N Ravindranath Kamath and another petitioner challenging the sale notice dated 19.01.2021 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cheque Dishonour Proceedings Against Partners Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 fails to satisfy requirements of Section 141 of the Act for imputing liability on partners.

The petitioners, accused No.1 (M/s. Conserve Ready Mix Concrete, a partnership firm) and accused No.2 and 3 (partners of the firm), filed a petition u...