Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1847 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1847 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Thane Municipal Corporation's Abeyance of Buy-Back Policy - Promissory Estoppel Applied. The court held that the Corporation could not resile from its policy after the petitioners acted on it to their detriment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

1 Nov 2023

The petitioners, Sheth Developers Pvt Ltd and Ashwin Natwarlal Sheth, acquired development rights over land from Voltas Ltd in 2003. In 2016, the Maha...

High Court

KAHC010026042017_1

9 Mar 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Return of Plaint in Ejectment Suit Filed Before Small Causes Court. Suit for Ejectment of Licensees Valued at Rs. 200/- is Cognizable by Small Causes Court Under Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

13 Feb 2017

The applicant, Ashok Khubchand Vaswani, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 409 of 2009 before the Small Causes Court at Nagpur seeking ejectment of the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Interim Arbitral Award in Loan Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's power to pass interim award under Section 31(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for admitted liability of Rs.100 crores.

23 Jun 2016

The petitioners, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Mr. T. Venkatram Reddy, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court Order Refusing to Reopen Evidence. Court holds that Order 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to fill gaps in evidence or to allow a party to adduce additional evidence after closure of evidence.

24 Feb 2020

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

2 Jul 2020

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

23 Jan 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Passing Off Suit Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — Assignment of Trade Mark to Third Party Constitutes Subsequent Event Justifying Impleadment and Amendment. The court held that amendment is necessary for effective adjudication and does not change the nature of the suit.

2 Feb 2005

The plaintiff, Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal, Karta of M/s. R.M. Dhariwal (HUF) and others, filed a suit (Suit No. 574 of 2004) against Kishore Washwan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Dismissal of Section 319 Cr.P.C Application as Premature; Directs Trial Court to Reconsider Summoning of Additional Accused Based on Examination-in-Chief. The High Court Held That Cross-Examination of the Witness Is Not a Prerequisite for Invoking Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Following Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab.

21 Jul 2026

The criminal revision petition was filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the order of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tenants' Petition in Rent Enhancement Dispute — Rent Controller's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court held that the Rent Controller must hear the tenants before directing deposit of arrears at enhanced rate under Section 22(3) of the Goa Rent Control Act.

14 Jun 2023

The petitioners, tenants of a premises rented at ₹20 per month, received a notice from the landlord on 15.04.2010 seeking enhancement of rent to ₹...

111 112 113 114 115

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)