Search Results for "substantive offence"

2245 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2245 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Discharge Application in CBI Bank Fraud Case — Petitioner Failed to Make Out a Case for Discharge Under Section 227 CrPC as Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy and Fraud Existed.

The petitioner, Nandlal Chaturvedi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 29 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and various sections of the Indian Penal Code. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unproven Age of Victim. Consensual Relationship Not Rape Under Sections 366 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, B. Suresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Raichur, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 Indian Penal Code. Appeal challenged reliance on last seen together, confession under Section 164 CrPC, and diary evidence in proving murder of mother-in-law.

The appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Add...