Search Results for "family needs"

4442 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4442 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reduces Penalty in Stamp Duty Dispute for Deed of Assent Treated as Gift Deed. Collector's Imposition of Maximum Ten-Times Penalty Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Discretionary Exercise.

The case involves a dispute over stamp duty and penalty imposed on a Deed of Assent executed by the Trustees of H.C. Dhanda Trust. Late Shri Harish Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree for Bonafide Requirement in Rent Control Case. Landlords' need for suit premises held genuine despite acquisition of additional rooms under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The original defendant (petitioner) was a tenant in suit premises consisting of two rooms admeasuring 10 ft X 10 ft and 8 ft X 10 ft. The plaintiffs (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wife's Petition Challenging Husband's Right to Enter Matrimonial Home Under Domestic Violence Act. Shared Residence Ordered for Both Spouses in Large Matrimonial Home Comprising Multiple Flats.

The petitioner-wife challenged a part of the order of the learned Judge, 2nd Family Court, Mumbai, dated 15th June 2010, which did not restrain the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property, and That the Trial Court Erred in Decreeing the Suit Without Proper Consideration of Evidence.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) over agricultural land. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the respondents (original plaintiffs) concerning land in Village...