Search Results for "expert witness"

1437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt.

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Sitaram Natha More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Alka, by setting her on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry and Harassment. Conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and cruelty beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Motiram Marotrao Bhongade, Sanjay Motiram Bhongade, Laxmibai Motiram Bhongade, and Leelabai Falke, were convicted by the 3rd Adhoc Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration Led to Benefit of Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 10/08/2000 passed by the learned Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 31 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Dispute Over Will Validity and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to prove execution of will and defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (Carlos Tavora and others) and the defendants (Maria Felicidade Fernandes e Lobo and other...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Will Validity — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court Holds That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title by Succession and That Will Executed in Favour of Defendant's Predecessor Was Genuine.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute concerning three agricultural lands (Gat Nos. 57, 58 and 59) situated at village Mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 498A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhimappa S/o Mallappa Bingi, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness. Sole eyewitness testimony found inconsistent and uncorroborated, failing to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 120B and 302 IPC.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the acquittal of respondents Ambedkar (A1) and Pennadathan @ Muthukumar (A2) for offences under Sections 120B...