WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2018
9 Jun 2021This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the constitution...
Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"
1752 result(s) found
Found 1752 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows ONGC's Appeal and Dismisses Soconord's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Oil Well Casing Pipes — Umpire's Award Upheld as Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940. Court Held That the Learned Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside the Award on Grounds of Non-Consideration of Certain Aspects, as the Umpire Had Considered All Relevant Material and the Award Was Not Vitiated by Any Error of Law Apparent on the Face of the Record.
24 Jul 2014The case involves cross-appeals arising from an arbitration dispute between Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) and M/s. Soconord OCTG, SA (S...
- 26
High Court
High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Partnership Dispute Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Writ Petition Allowed
30 Jan 2026The petitioner, filed a writ petition seeking direction to the police to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 29.09.2025 alleging various offe...
- 711
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.
6 Jul 2011The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80V for Interest on Borrowings for Tax Payment and Directs Recomputation of Disallowance Under Rule 6D on Aggregate Trip Basis. The Court held that Section 80V deduction is available if borrowings were for tax payment, and Rule 6D disallowance must be computed on aggregate trips per employee.
1 Aug 2014The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 1985-86. The assessee, M/s Mafa...
- 164
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.
12 Apr 2022The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...
- 341
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.
13 Mar 2018The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Established. Court held that factual findings of arbitrator cannot be re-opened in Section 34 proceedings and that claims not pressed cannot be revived.
12 Oct 2011The Petitioner, M/s. Ambika Construction Co., was the original claimant in an arbitration arising out of a construction contract for a Plant Quarantin...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of News Broadcaster's Petition Challenging RBI Refusal to Accept Compounding Applications Under Foreign Exchange Management Act. The Court Examines the Compounding Process and the Validity of the 2017 Amendment to Rule 8(2) Barring Compounding When Section 37A Proceedings Are Contemplated.
26 Jun 2018The petitioner, a public limited news broadcasting company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actio...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Payment of Withheld Amount and Rejection of Counter Claim. Arbitral Tribunal's findings on contractual interpretation and withholding of payments are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as they are within the realm of factual appreciation and contractual interpretation.
11 Jun 2013The appeal arises from a decision of a learned Single Judge dated 4 April 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...
- 85
