Search Results for "Rule 137"

1265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Tender Cancellation as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Petitioner's Highest Bid Accepted After 21 Months, Cancellation Without Justification Violates Article 14.

The petitioner, Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, participated in an e-auction conducted by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student to Complete B.V.Sc. & A.H. Course Beyond 10-Year Limit - University Regulation 9(18) Held Not Retrospective. Regulation restricting completion period to 10 years cannot be applied to student admitted before its enforcement.

The petitioner, Nirmalkumar s/o Kripa Narayan Singh, was admitted to the B.V.Sc. & A.H. degree course at the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Claim Over Domain Name 'secondshaadi.com' — Finds 'Shaadi' Generic and Descriptive. Plaintiff's mark 'Shaadi.com' lacks distinctiveness for exclusive use; no likelihood of confusion as 'secondshaadi' denotes a different service.

The Plaintiff, People Interactive (India) Private Limited, owner of the well-known matrimonial website 'Shaadi.com', filed a suit against Vivek Pahwa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

The petitioner, Vicky Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), through his brother Rahul Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), challenged the preventive detention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish that the detenue's activities affected public order.

The petitioner, Vicky Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), through his brother Rahul Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), challenged the legality and validity...