Search Results for "Central Government employee"

2204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Amended Recruitment Rules Equating Posts of Principal and Joint Chief Inspector of Factories as Infructuous Due to Retirement of Employee. Transfer Order Set Aside as Mala Fide; Period Between Transfer and Superannuation Treated as Dies Non.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a common judgment of the Madras High Court confirming orders of the Central Administrative Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Examines Challenge to Appointment of Administrator for Cooperative Bank; Petitioners Contend That Appointment by Joint Registrar on State's Instruction Lacked Independent Application and Was Invalid Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The matter arose from two writ petitions consolidated before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petitioners, primary cooperative societies ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...