Search Results for "temporary embargo"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Slum Dweller for Profiteering from Slum Rehabilitation Tenement. Illegal Transfer and Commercial Use of Residential Premises Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 Upheld Eviction.

The petitioner, Rajendra R. Vishwakarma, was a slum dweller who received tenement no. 104 in 'A' wing of New Prabhat Cooperative Housing Society Ltd, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Injunction in Parking Space Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioner failed to establish exclusive right over stilt parking space as it was not part of the sale deed.

The petitioner, Udai Raj Singh Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Broker-Client Dispute. Court Upholds Award Directing Payment of Rs.1,58,39,459.87 but Refuses Interest and Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Harinarayan Bajaj, entered into various share transactions on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) through the respondent, Madhukar Sheth, w...