KAHC030058312022_1
25 Jun 2024...
Search Results for "supply agreement"
2129 result(s) found
Found 2129 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. in Insolvency Case — Holds That Statutory Charge Under Electricity Supply Agreement Survives Liquidation and Must Be Respected Under IBC. The Court ruled that a charge created under Section 53 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with contractual terms is not extinguished by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the liquidator must treat the appellant as a secured creditor.
1 Jan 2023The appellant, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL), a state electricity distribution company, entered into an electricity supply agreement ...
- 186
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Applications to Vacate Arrest of Vessels in Bunker Supply Disputes Involving Insolvent Intermediary. Maritime Claim for Bunkers Supplied to Vessel Held Enforceable In Rem Despite Lack of Privity Between Supplier and Owner.
15 Apr 2015The High Court of Bombay heard two notices of motion filed by the defendants in two admiralty suits seeking to vacate the arrest of their vessels. The...
- 160
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Leave and Licence Dispute — Interest on Security Deposit for Delay Period Not Payable as Liquidated Damages Without Proof of Loss. The court modified the award to limit interest to the actual delay period at the contractual rate, holding that the arbitrator's award of interest for the entire period including post-possession was contrary to the agreement and Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
11 Feb 2019The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator in a di...
- 88
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Revenue's Challenge Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Service Tax Demand on Oil Companies for CNG Sale. Dispute Concerns Classification of CNG Sale by BPCL and HPCL as Business Auxiliary Service under Section 65(19) of Finance Act, 1994.
1 Jan 1970The present civil appeals before the Supreme Court, filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, ...
- 45
High Court
- 11
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Tax Classification Case Due to Failure to Prove Job Work Exemption. Services Provided Were Held as Manpower Supply Under Finance Act, 1994, Not Exempt as Job Work Under Notification No.25/2012-Service Tax, Based on Agreement Terms and Lack of Registration Amendment.
18 Feb 2022The dispute involved an appeal against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) regarding service tax classificatio...
- 273
High Court
High Court Considers Maintainability and Exemption Issue in Writ Petition Against Tax Demand on Alleged Non-Export Sale. Interprets Section 5(3) of CST Act Regarding Penultimate Sale Deemed Export.
4 Aug 2014The petitioner, a manufacturer of submarine navy batteries, challenged orders demanding sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the ground t...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute — Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was based on evidence and within the contract terms, and no interference was warranted.
21 Jan 2014The petitioner, M/s. BhavaniCotex, a proprietary firm engaged in the cotton business, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Specific Performance as Agreement Was Only a Draft. The court held that a draft agreement shared for suggestions does not constitute a concluded contract, and the balance of convenience favored the defendant-owner under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.
20 Mar 2023The applicant, Jatin Jitendra Rasiklal Shah, was the original defendant No.1 and owner of Nazul Plot No. 2/1 in Amravati. The respondent No.1, Shardul...
- 62
