Search Results for "supplementary agreement"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for 2% Contract Value Without Work Execution. Claim for facilitation fee under MOU fails as appellant did not perform any work for the contract awarded to the joint venture.

The appellant, M/s. Pratibha Industries Limited, filed a commercial appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Flat Purchaser Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Incomplete Flat Due to Struts. Developer directed to remove struts and complete flat within 12 weeks or pay compensation.

The petitioners, Shahveer Padam Kapadia and another, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR Registered at Nanded Police Station for Offences Under Sections 498A, 406 IPC Quashed as All Alleged Incidents Occurred in Pune, Not Within Local Jurisdiction Under Section 177 CrPC.

The applicants, Sumanbai Chinchvankar (mother-in-law) and Gajendra Chinchvankar (husband), filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company Application as Not Maintainable for Lack of Leave Under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Applicants Sought Declaration Against Depositors Management Committee Without Prior Approval of Company Court.

The judgment pertains to Company Application No.85 of 2014 filed by six applicants (Shri Kashinath R. Jhunjhunwala and others) against M/s Laxmichand ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Assessment on Flat Purchase Agreements. Agreements for sale of flats in a building under construction are agreements to sell, not conveyances, and stamp duty is to be assessed on the consideration stated in the agreement, not on market value.

The petitioner, M/s. Padmavati Construction Co., a partnership firm, was developing a plot of land in Chembur, Mumbai. The registered owner, Bombay Co...