W.A.Nos.3589 and 3607 of 2025 AND
9 Jul 2026The judgment text provided only includes the case title, party names, and procedural details. No facts, legal issues, arguments, or decision are avail...
Search Results for "state seniority list"
743 result(s) found
Found 743 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amalgamation of Education Officer and Administrative Officer Cadres in Maharashtra Education Service. The court upheld the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's order rejecting the challenge to the amalgamation and the revised recruitment rules, holding that the government's policy decision was valid and the petitioners had no vested right to promotion.
15 Dec 2023The petitioners, Sheshrao Namdev Bade and others, were working as Education Officers, Group-A in the School Education and Sports Department of Maharas...
- 34
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.
14 Mar 2022The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...
- 298
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows UPSC Appeal in IAS Promotion Case — Selection Committee's Assessment Upheld. Variation in Grading and Delay in Seniority Refixation Do Not Vitiate Selection Process Under IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955.
15 Nov 2019The case pertains to the promotion of State Civil Service officers to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) for the Tamil Nadu Cadre for the year 20...
- 282
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in CRPF Seniority Dispute — Direct Recruits Rank Senior to Promotees. Date of Allotment to Units Constitutes Date of Appointment Under Rule 8(e) of CRPF Rules, 1955.
27 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed appeals by direct recruit Sub Inspectors (General Duty) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Union of India ag...
- 199
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Promotion Dispute — Continuous Service Under Recruitment Rules Must Be Actual Service, Not Deemed Date. The Court held that the deemed date of promotion under Seniority Rules cannot be treated as actual continuous service for eligibility under Recruitment Rules, quashing the promotion of Respondent No. 3 to Section Officer.
10 May 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Girish Kumar against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had upheld the promo...
- 374
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Order of Agricultural Officer on Grounds of Malafides and Violation of Transfer Policy. Transfer Order Quashed as It Was Not in Public Interest and Was Motivated to Accommodate Another Officer.
26 Feb 2018The petitioner, Sandeep Dashrath Shirsath, was working as an Agricultural Officer at Panchayat Samiti Paithan, Aurangabad. He was transferred by an or...
- 35
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Fixation in Judicial Service — Petitioner's Continuous Service from Initial Appointment Entitles Her to Seniority Over Colleague. Transfer on Request Does Not Break Continuity for Seniority Purposes Under Karnataka Judicial Department Rules.
2 Jan 2014The petitioner, Mrs. Elize Mascarehnas, was appointed as a typist in the SDA cadre on 21.06.1985 in the District and Sessions Court, Kodagu District, ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Promotions of Assistant Engineers. Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without MPSC Consultation Were Held Illegal.
17 Mar 2010The case involves multiple writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 11.9.2003 in Original Application ...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.
17 Mar 2006The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...
- 110
