Search Results for "shared maintenance"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Matrimonial Dispute Over Possessory Rights to Shared Household. Wife's Claim for Right to Residence Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Dismissed as Act Not in Force at Time of Filing.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband challenging a common judgment and order dated 30.12.2004 passed by the Family Court No.4, Mumbai. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging De-registration of Housing Federation in Ongoing Real Estate Project — RERA Rule 9(1)(ii) Overrides MCS Act for Formation of Apex Body Before Project Completion.

The petitioner, Lodha Belmondo Housing Federation Ltd., a federation registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal in DV Act Case, Directs Husband to Pay ₹65 Lakhs as Permanent Settlement. Court upholds wife's right to alternative accommodation under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and converts rental order into lump sum payment.

The case involves a dispute under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The appellant, Neelam Gupta, married Mahipal Shar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Three Establishments Denied Exemption Under Employees' Provident Funds Act. Functional Integrality and Common Ownership with Parent Company Preclude Claim of New Establishment Status Under Section 16(1)(d).

The Supreme Court dismissed three civil appeals filed by M/s. Shree Vishal Printers Ltd., Jaipur (SVPL), M/s. Times Publishing House Ltd., Jaipur (TPH...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Married Sister-in-Law in DV Act Case Due to Absence of Domestic Relationship. Petitioner Never Resided with Complainant in Shared Household, Hence Not a 'Respondent' Under Section 2(q) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The case involves a petition filed by Mrs. Kinjal Jayesh Mehta challenging an order of the Sessions Court that set aside the Metropolitan Magistrate's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court's Interim Residence Order in Domestic Violence Case. Residence Order Under Section 19 of DV Act Cannot Be Passed as Interim Relief Before Disposal of Main Application Under Section 12.

The petitioner, Mr. Amit Satish Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 March 2013 passed by the Family Court. The Family Court had ...