Search Results for "section 32G"

110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Default and Non-User Not Interfered With. Tenant's Failure to Pay Rent and Non-User of Premises for Stated Purpose Justify Eviction Under Bombay Rents, Hotel & Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals arising from a landlord-tenant dispute over eviction. The plaintiff purchased the suit property in 1986 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Tenancy Dispute, Restores Orders of Agricultural Land Tribunal and SDO. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 — MRT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landholder Damodar, challenged a judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 16 Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that petitioners failed to prove tenancy rights under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The petitioners, Pradip Vasudeo Ekbote and others, filed four writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Petitioner's Long Possession as Tenant Does Not Bar Restoration.

The petitioner, Hirakant Ramchandra Kothari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 23...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Land.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession over agricultural land. The trial court dismissed the suit, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Land Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Findings of Fact Are Not Perverse. The court held that concurrent findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the petitioners (heirs of the original plaintiff) challenging the concurrent findings of the lower courts i...