Search Results for "reconstruction licence"

112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal, Upholds ESI Court's Quashing of Damages Order Under Section 85-B of ESI Act Due to Time Bar Under Section 77(1A) Proviso.

The High Court dismissed the appeal by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, which challenged the ESI Court's order quashing a damages order und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Housewife. Notional Income of Deceased Housewife Fixed at Rs. 3,000 per Month with Multiplier of 15 and 1/3rd Deduction for Personal Expenses.

The present appeal was filed by the claimants, Smt. Yeshoda Y. Palyekar and Prakash Yeshwant Palyekar, being aggrieved by the judgment and award dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case Under Bombay Rent Act for Encroachment and Change of User. Concurrent findings of fact on grounds under Section 13(1)(c) and Section 13(1)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1974 upheld.

The petitioner, Laxmibai Ganpati Bhingare, was the tenant of an open plot admeasuring 30 sq.ft x 20 sq.ft in Sangli, owned by the respondent, Shivaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and Not on Private Land.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff in a suit against the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC). He resided and ran a b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and No Prior Notice Required.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a notice ...