Search Results for "reasonable person test"

4156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Gulshan Kumar Murder Case — Life Imprisonment for Murder and Attempt to Murder Confirmed. Evidence of Identification by Injured Witness and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The judgment pertains to the murder of Gulshan Kumar Dua, the founder of T-Series, who was shot dead on 12 August 1997. The appellant, Abdul Rauf Dawo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt, relying on motive, last seen, and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of a young girl, Monika Dashrath Kirnapure, on 11.03.2011 near KDK College, Nagpur. The appellants, Krunal Jaiswal, Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivers Judgment on Death Sentence Confirmation in POCSO Case Involving Sexual Assault of Three Minor Girls. The Court Considers Reliability of Minor Victims’ Testimony, Delay in FIR, and Definition of Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act.

The High Court of Madras (Madurai Bench) delivered a common judgment in a referred trial (RT(MD) No.4 of 2026) for confirmation of death sentence and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cut-Off Marks in Screening Test for Junior Scale Officer Recruitment. Rule 10 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 Requires Objective Criteria; Commission's Discretion Must Be Exercised Reasonably.

The petitioners, who applied for the post of Junior Scale Officer in the Goa Civil Services, challenged the action of the Goa Public Service Commissio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...