Search Results for "promotion orders"

1929 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1929 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Denial of Promotion Based on Uncommunicated Adverse Remarks — Violation of Natural Justice. Non-communication of adverse entries in ACR renders them void and cannot be used to deny promotion under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, F H Shaikh, joined service on 10/05/1982 as a Class-II officer (Principal) under the Director of Employment and Training, Gujarat Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Jail Guard Whose Promotion Was Cancelled Without Hearing. Cancellation of Promotion from Jail Guard to Jailor Grade-II Based on Tribunal Order Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Namdeo Sopan Arsale, was a Jail Guard who was promoted to the post of Jailor Grade-II. Subsequently, the Additional Director General o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Pay Scale Dispute Under Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. The Court held that office orders introducing a stagnation scheme did not require gazette notification under Section 79, as the Board had authority under existing regulations to fix pay scales.

The appeal arose from a dispute over pay scales for Junior Engineers (Civil) employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB). To address stagnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Based on Ad-Hoc Promotee Father's Service. Compassionate appointment scheme does not extend to dependents of ad-hoc promotees whose promotion was never confirmed.

The petitioner, Nikhil Maruti Gosarade, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 25 June 2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Additional Increments to Graduate Employees Promoted to Clerks in BEST Undertaking. The court held that BCR No.19 applies to all graduate clerks, including those promoted from lower categories, and denial amounts to unfair labour practice.

The case involves a challenge by the BEST Undertaking against an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 20 March 2021, in Complaint (ULP) No. 49...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitrary Revision of Seniority of Directors in Indian Postal Service for Violation of Article 16 of Constitution. Selective Promotion Not Based on Seniority and Revision Without Rule Held Discriminatory.

The petitioners, S. K. Ghosh and another, were promoted from Postal Superintendents Service Class II to the time scale of Class I Service in the India...