KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "offences under securities law"
176 result(s) found
Found 176 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Proceedings for Lack of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act. Directors Contend Complaints Merely Name Them Without Alleging Active Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.
1 Jul 2026The case concerns multiple criminal petitions filed by Kavitha Chopra and Dhirendra Chopra, directors of OSIA Hyper Retail Limited, seeking to quash p...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Criminal Proceedings in Cheating and Fraud Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute arising from sale of warehouse and land where complainant failed to pay balance consideration does not constitute criminal offences under IPC, MPID Act, or IT Act.
3 Dec 2025The applicants, Ramanrao Bolla, his wife Vijaylaxmi, and his brother Tirupatirao, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sura...
- 229
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Implead Additional Witnesses in Motor Accident Claim — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Tribunal's Discretionary Order. The Court held that the Tribunal's decision to reject impleadment of proposed respondents as unnecessary parties does not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
22 Apr 2025The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the Manager of ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited under Article 227 of the Constitut...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction of Property Under MPID Act — Petitioner Cannot Challenge Auction After Being Declared Successful Bidder. Court Held That Petitioner's Own Conduct of Participating in Auction with Knowledge of Attachments and Seeking Specific Performance Before MPID Court Precludes Challenge Under Article 226.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...
- 776
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.
1 Feb 2024The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...
- 30
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against DNA Test Order in Divorce Case, Upholding Marital Presumption of Paternity. The Court Held That the Presumption Under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Cannot Be Rebutted by DNA Evidence Alone Without Proof of Non-Access, Protecting the Child's Legitimacy and Privacy Rights.
20 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a divorce petition filed by the husband under Sections 13(1)(i) and (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, alleging adultery by ...
- 1615
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Damages Against Employer in EPF Act Case for Default in Contributions. Levy of Damages Under Section 14B is Consequential Upon Default Without Requirement of Mens Rea for Breach of Civil Obligations.
23 Feb 2022The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka, which upheld an order for recovery of damages under Section 14B of the Employees Pro...
- 502
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.
25 Aug 2021The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.
12 Feb 2016The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...
- 76
