Search Results for "mining offences"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in PMLA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and No Likelihood of Speedy Trial — Twin Conditions Under Section 45 PMLA Relaxed as Bail is Rule and Jail is Exception.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Prem Prakash against the judgment of the High Court of Jharkhand which had dismissed his bail application in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/S SVB Stone Crushers, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri K H Suresh, filed a writ petition under Section 482 read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal in Sohrabuddin Case for Lack of Maintainability. Appellant, examined as a prosecution witness, not considered a 'victim' under Section 372 Cr.P.C. as he was not the person who suffered loss or injury directly from the crime.

The case involves an appeal filed by Mahendrasinh Jorubha Zala, who was examined as a prosecution witness (PW-205) in a trial concerning the alleged c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...