High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 195
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/S SVB Stone Crushers, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri K H Suresh, filed a writ petition under Section 482 read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the entire proceedings originating from a complaint dated 19.02.2019 filed by the 5th respondent, the Geologist (Mines), Department of Mines and Geology, Tumkur, which was registered as PCR No.39/2019 pending before the Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kunigal, Tumkur District. The petitioner argued that the complaint was filed without obtaining the mandatory sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, which requires prior sanction from the Central Government or the State Government or an authorized officer for prosecution of offences under the Act. The respondents, represented by the High Court Government Pleader, opposed the petition. The court, after hearing arguments, found that the complaint by the Geologist, who is not the authorized officer under Section 22, was filed without the requisite sanction. The court held that the proceedings were without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. The court allowed the writ petition and quashed the entire proceedings in PCR No.39/2019.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Proceedings - Section 482 CrPC - Writ Jurisdiction - Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings in PCR No.39/2019 arising from a complaint by the Geologist for alleged illegal mining - Court held that the complaint lacked mandatory sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, rendering the proceedings without jurisdiction - Held that the proceedings are liable to be quashed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal proceedings initiated on a complaint filed by the Geologist without prior sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 are maintainable and liable to be quashed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in PCR No.39/2019 pending on the file of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kunigal, Tumkur District are quashed.

Law Points

  • Sanction under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act
  • 1957 is mandatory for prosecution of offences under the Act
  • Complaint by a Geologist without sanction is not maintainable
  • Writ of certiorari lies to quash proceedings without jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (KAR) (10) 5

WP No. 22388 of 2019 (GM-RES)

2022-10-14

SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

Sri. R.G. Kolle (for petitioner), Sri. Shankar H.S, HCGP (for respondents)

M/S SVB Stone Crushers

The State of Karnataka, The Secretary to Govt., Dept. of Commerce & Industries, The Director & Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Mr.T.Mahantesh, Mr.Naveen P.S.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Section 482 CrPC and Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in a mining complaint.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the entire proceedings in PCR No.39/2019 pending before Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kunigal.

Filing Reason

The complaint was filed by the Geologist without prior sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

Issues

Whether the criminal proceedings initiated on a complaint filed by the Geologist without prior sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 are maintainable and liable to be quashed.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the complaint lacked mandatory sanction under Section 22 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. Respondents opposed the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

A complaint for offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 requires prior sanction under Section 22 of the Act. Without such sanction, the proceedings are without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; a. Issue a Writ of certiorari or any other order or direction, directing to quash or set aside the entire proceedings originated from the Complaint dated 19.02.2019 filed by 5th Respondent Geologist at PCR No.39/2019 pending on the filed of Prl. Civil Judge & JMFC, Kunigal, Tumkur District, produced at Annexure-A and etc.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 482 CrPC and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in PCR No.39/2019. The petition was reserved for orders on 12.9.2022 and the court pronounced the order on 14.10.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957: 22
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Constitution of India: 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Mining Complaint Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Complaint Filed by Geologist Without Prior Sanction from Central or State Government is Not Maintainable.
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Disposes Consumer Complaint as Settled and Withdrawn - Complaint Withdrawn Following Settlement Between Parties