Search Results for "maximum damages"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "maximum damages"

428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Allowing Price Reduction Deductions by HPCL Against Pipeline Contractor. Arbitral Award Rejecting Claims of Rs.3.28 Crores for Alleged Delay in Pipeline Project Upheld as No Perversity Found in Interpretation of Price Reduction Clause.

24 Mar 2015

The dispute arose from a contract for laying pipelines and associated facilities for the Pune-Solapur Pipeline Project awarded by Hindustan Petroleum ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Widow's Compensation Claim for Jail Death Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Court holds that mere death in custody does not automatically entitle compensation; petitioner must establish negligence or violation of rights by jail authorities.

3 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Priyanka wd/o Yogesh Rathod, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking compensation of Rs. 50 lakh for the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% per annum. The court held that an interest rate of 18% pendente lite was excessive and modified it to 12% while maintaining post-award interest at 15% under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Container Corporation of India Ltd. (CONCOR) agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

30 Jan 2023

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Time Bar Clause. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that the petitioner failed to raise dispute within 30 days was based on evidence and not perverse, and demurrage was not conditional on indemnity.

30 Jun 2005

The case arises from a contract between Larsen & Toubro Limited (petitioner) and Sunfield Resources Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) for the supply of steaming ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

27 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

8 Aug 2017

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows VIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Compensation Reduced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land with 10% Deduction for Development Charges.

9 Sep 2020

The case pertains to a land acquisition dispute where the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) appealed against the enhancement of compe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Possession — Compensation Modified to 9% Interest Per Annum in Line with Consent Orders. The Court held that the developer is entitled to a three-year completion period and compensation for delay shall be at a uniform rate of 9% per annum, not the higher rates awarded by the NCDRC.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) concerning d...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)