Search Results for "materially affected result"

412 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 412 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a gala in Dhiraj Pen Compound, Andheri, filed a suit challenging a demolition notice dated 17 September 2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.

The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Copyright Infringement Claim Against Film 'Umeed' — No Substantial Similarity Found. Court holds that ideas and themes are not copyrightable under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the plaintiff failed to establish access or copying.

The plaintiff, Shivani Tibrewala, a writer/director, filed a suit alleging copyright infringement by the defendants, Rajat Mukherjee and others, in re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...