High Court of Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 1811 of 2019 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The specific outcome and legal findings are not disclosed in the provided judgment excerpt.
15 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "managing agent"
371 result(s) found
Found 371 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Damages Suit. Section 125 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 does not bar civil suit for damages against co-operative society and its employees for acts outside the scope of the Act.
27 Nov 2024The petitioner, defendant No.3 (Branch Manager of Karnataka State Co-operative Consumer's Federation Ltd.), filed a Civil Revision Petition under Sect...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11(6) Application and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Property Sale Dispute. Arbitration clauses in MOU and Agreement for Sale held prima facie valid, and dispute referred to arbitration despite respondent's objection regarding non-signing of agreement.
7 Aug 2023The applicant, Bhupinder Singh Balwant Singh, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 cannot be initiated against directors without specific averments of their role in the company's affairs.
28 Nov 2022The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) challenging a common order dated...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Defamation Complaint Against Company Officials for Termination Letter Sent to Prospective Employer. Communication of termination to a prospective employer does not amount to publication to a third party under Section 500 IPC.
28 Nov 2022The applicants, who were employees of Future Generali India Life Insurance Company Limited, challenged an order dated 30/11/2017 passed by the Judicia...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Essential Commodities Act Case — Offences Under Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 of the Act Held Bailable. The court held that since the primary offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 are bailable, anticipatory bail can be granted even if other non-bailable offences are alleged.
10 Dec 2020The applicants, Vikrant Angolkar (an employee of M/s Jay Anand Food Industries) and Bhimashankar Khade (a commission agent), filed anticipatory bail a...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Registrar's Order and Sale Deed in Co-operative Society Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Bye-laws. Petitioner's Membership and Right to Property Upheld as Registrar Failed to Provide Hearing Before Approving Transfer of Shares and Sale of Site.
29 Mar 2016The petitioner, Smt. Siddamma, aged 75, is the wife of late S.K. Narasimhaiah and a member of Bhavani Housing Co-operative Society Limited (respondent...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Appointment of Court Receiver for Possession of Flats for Demolition and Reconstruction. Court holds that disputes regarding redevelopment of a cooperative housing society are not arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as they involve statutory rights and obligations under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
18 Mar 2013The petitioner, Bharat Infrastructure and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conc...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House License for Violation of Natural Justice. Licensee Not Present During Alleged Obscene Acts; Suspension Without Notice and Hearing Set Aside Under Bombay Police Act, 1951.
23 Nov 2011The petitioner, Ramarai Rammilan Rai, was a co-licensee of an eating house known as 'Missile Restaurant and Bar' in Goregaon, Mumbai, holding a licens...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether a Bond Executed by a Company Director Constituted a Contract of Guarantee or Indemnity Under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Court Also Examined the Binding Nature of a Scheme of Composition Sanctioned Under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 on Dissenting Creditors.
17 Sep 1969The case involved a cash-credit account opened by the first respondent company with the appellant bank. On June 7, 1953, the company executed a promis...
