Search Results for "licence rejection"

439 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 439 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Firearm Licence Based on Non-Existent Pending Criminal Cases. Licensing Authority's Decision Influenced by Factually Incorrect Ground of Pendency of Criminal Cases.

The petitioner, Sheshrao @ Vijay Bhikaji Salve, applied for a licence to acquire, hold, and possess a firearm under the Arms Act, 1959. The licensing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State in Essential Commodities Control Order Continuation Case Due to Savings Provisions. Cotton Textiles (Control of Movement) Order, 1948, Held to Continue in Force Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955, by Virtue of Section 16 of the Ordinance and Section 16(2) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a prosecution under the Cotton Textiles (Control of Movement) Order, 1948. The Order was originally made by the Central Governm...