APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 54 OF 2012
12 Mar 2015The matter involved two appeals from orders arising out of Special Civil Suit No.2/2012 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Bicholim. The...
Search Results for "interlocutory order challenge"
1116 result(s) found
Found 1116 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.
1 Jan 2025The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...
- 738
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Pledge and Corporate Guarantee — Holds That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favored Appellant for Injunction Against Enforcement of Personal Guarantees and Share Pledge Pending Arbitration.
2 May 2023The appellant, Palmview Investments Overseas Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, filed an appeal against an order of the Co...
- 22
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitrator's Orders Refusing Additional Documents. Arbitrator's discretion to close evidence and reject additional documents upheld as not exceeding jurisdiction under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Aug 2018The petitioner, Radiant Infosystems Limited, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders p...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Transfer Dispute. Workman's Compliance with Transfer Order Renders Complaint Infructuous; Interim Relief Set Aside.
29 Jul 2015The petitioner, M/s NRB Bearings Limited, challenged an order dated 08/07/2015 passed by the Industrial Court, Jalna, in Complaint (ULP) No.56/2015. T...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration. Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Held Independent of Declaration Under Section 4, Not Barred by Interim Order.
1 Mar 2016The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, challenged the acquisition of their property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanju...
- 122
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Injunction Order Against Digital Media Journalist in Defamation Suit Concerning Dharmasthala Temple Allegations. The High Court found the order granting mandatory injunction without hearing the petitioner and without reasons was illegal and unconstitutional prior restraint.
1 Aug 2025The writ petition was filed by a digital media journalist (defendant No. 66 in the underlying defamation suit) challenging an ex-parte ad-interim inju...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application in Eviction Suit — Maintainability Under Article 227 Not Available When Revision Under Section 115 CPC Lies. Composite Application Including Issues Beyond Plaint Rejection Does Not Convert Order into One Not Subject to Revision.
18 Dec 2019The petitioner, Jasraj Lalaji Oswal, was the defendant in Civil Suit No. 9 of 2016 filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking his eviction. In that...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of DRAT Orders on Pre-Deposit Waiver and Status Quo in Secured Asset Auction. Legal Question Concerns Applicability of Section 18 Pre-Deposit Requirement to Appeals Dismissing Condonation of Delay and Challenging Sale Certificate.
8 Jun 2026The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by an auction purchaser (Aloukik Construwell LLP) and a secured creditor (HDFC Bank Limited) challengin...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.
4 Jun 2018The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...
- 275
