Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2363 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2363 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Refund Applications Under Maharashtra Stamp Act. Refund of Stamp Duty on Deemed Cancellation of Agreements for Sale Allowed Where Agreements Were Not Registered and No Instrument of Cancellation Was Executed.

3 Sep 2025

The Petitioners, Qwik Supply Chain Pvt Ltd and another, filed two Writ Petitions challenging the orders dated 07.03.2015 and 08.02.2018 passed by the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Interest Rate to 9% in Consumer Disputes Against Developer for Delayed Possession. The Court upheld deficiency in service but reduced interest from 15% to 9% per annum, following earlier precedent in Himanshu Arora case.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from consumer complaints against DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. regarding its residential proje...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in Forest Land Conversion Case — Refund of Compulsory Deposit Ordered by Single Judge Set Aside. Deposit under Section 79A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 for conversion of forest land to non-forest purpose is not refundable upon grant of permission.

6 Jan 2020

The State of Karnataka, through the Deputy Conservator of Forests and other authorities, filed a writ appeal against an order of a learned Single Judg...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund to Flat Purchaser for Inordinate Delay in Possession — Builder's Unfair Contract Terms Not Binding. Builder's failure to apply for occupancy certificate within stipulated time constitutes deficiency of service; one-sided clauses in Apartment Buyer's Agreement are unfair and not binding under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. against orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Interest Rate and Compensation for Delayed Flat Possession. The Court held that the NCDRC's award of 9% interest per annum on the refund amount was fair and reasonable, and reduced compensation from Rs. 10,00,000 to Rs. 7,50,000, considering the appellant's status as a state instrumentality.

19 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by a home buyer against a developer for delayed possession of a 3 BHK flat and unfair trade practice...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

5 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Royalty Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 2007 — Limitation Circular of 2011 Held Applicable to Claims Filed After Its Issuance. The court upheld the rejection of a claim for refund of royalty for the year 2011-2012 as time-barred under a government circular dated 17.06.2011, even though the eligibility certificate was issued earlier.

7 Apr 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Chinteshwar Steel Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund for Unexcavated Sand in Auction Contract Dispute — State Cannot Retain Money for Non-Excavated Material Without Justification. The Court held that the State's rejection of refund was arbitrary and that the petitioner is entitled to refund for sand not excavated due to the State's own illegal prohibition on mechanical excavation.

8 Jan 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Wasim Khan Material Suppliers, participated in a public auction on 16.01.2015 for the right to excavate sand from Godegaon Sand G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows IGST Refund to Exporter Despite Initial Error in GST Return. Inadvertent Mistake in Invoice Number and Port Code in GSTR-1 Does Not Bar Refund of IGST on Zero-Rated Supply Under Section 16(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Sunlight Cable Industries, exported insulated cables to M/s. Khin Maung Tum & Brothers Co. Ltd., Myanmar, and paid Integrated Goods an...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)