Search Results for "income tax penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "income tax penalty"

553 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 553 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Freezing of Demat Accounts of Promoter for Non-Compliant Company Under SEBI Circulars — Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Freezing of all securities held by a promoter in a non-compliant company, including unrelated investments, without notice or hearing is arbitrary and illegal under Article 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

26 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by Dr. Pradeep Mehta and his son Neil Pradeep Mehta challenging the freezing of their demat acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

6 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Procedural Irregularity. Rule 6(2) proviso requiring pre-deposit of 50% of disputed tax before filing declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read down as directory, not mandatory.

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Nabeel Construction Pvt. Ltd., engaged in construction services, was subjected to an investigation by the Directorate General of GST I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Petroleum Dealers Challenging VAT Assessment Orders. Assessment orders under Dadra and Nagar Haveli Value Added Tax Act, 2005 set aside as barred by limitation and violative of natural justice.

21 May 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several petroleum dealers (M/s. Yogi Petroleum, Jay Jalaram Construction Co., M/s. Ratan P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Cash Credit Case — Upholds Addition Under Section 68 Despite Rejection of Books for Gross Profit. Books of Account Can Be Partially Relied Upon for Different Additions Even After Rejection Under Section 145(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

24 Apr 2020

The appeal arose from a challenge to an addition of Rs.2,26,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as unexplained cash credits. The ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Penalty Jurisdiction Case — CIT(A) Remand Order Wipes Out AO's Penalty Initiation. Penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot survive after the assessment order containing the satisfaction for initiation is set aside by CIT(A) without specific direction.

4 Feb 2020

The appellant, Gangadhar Narsingas Agrawal (HUF), filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1997-1998 disclosing a loss. The Assessing Officer (AO)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons to Believe Income Escaped Assessment. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Cost of Acquisition Under Section 55(2)(b)(ii) is Invalid.

22 Dec 2017

The petitioner, J.B. Amin & Brothers (HUF), owned land at Aurangpura, Aurangabad, purchased by late Balubhai Amin for Rs.1,80,000. After his death in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)