Search Results for "immoral traffic prevention"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "immoral traffic prevention"

132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1950 for Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that mere registration of criminal cases without evidence of continuous harmful activity does not justify externment.

5 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Anil Chabildas Choudhary, an active member of the Rashtravadi Congress Party (NCP) in Bhusawal Municipal Council, challenged the exter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in POCSO Case — No Violation of Article 22 or BNSS Provisions Found. Detention of Accused in Custody for Offences Under IPC, POCSO Act, and Immoral Traffic Act Held Lawful.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Ashok Sahadev Patil, filed a Habeas Corpus petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention in connection with C.R.No.4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Gang Rape Acquittal — Trial Court's Finding of Inconsistent Child Testimony and Lack of Corroboration Upheld. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 376(2)(g) IPC and Section 5 of Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act.

18 Jun 2014

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 28 January 2011 passed by the Sessions Court at Dindoshi, Mumbai in Sessions Ca...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Habeas Corpus Petition Against Preventive Detention Order under Karnataka Goonda Act. Detenu Alleges Non-Consideration of Representation and Arbitrary Use of Power by Police Inspector.

19 Sep 2022

The writ petition is a habeas corpus proceeding filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the detenu and his wife against the Commission...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenue — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that the detaining authority must ensure the detenue understands the grounds of detention to make an effective representation; failure to do so renders the detention illegal.

31 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Smt. Shrenika, wife of the detenue Sri. Huchappa @ Dhanaraj Kalebag, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that failure to supply grounds in Telugu, the only language known to the detenu, vitiated the detention order and ordered his release.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, wife of the detenu Giddappa @ Lambu Giddappa, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioner in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Legally Enforceable Debt. The court held that the essential ingredient of a legally enforceable debt or liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was missing, and therefore the FIR was liable to be quashed.

8 Sep 2005

The petitioner, Ms. Khushi Harkishan Malhotra, filed two criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR registered ag...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated and Relevant Documents Were Not Supplied.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)