Search Results for "gross delay"

942 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 942 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default Due to Counsel's Negligence. Negligence of Advocate Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Sardar Himmatbhai Khokar, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.794 of 2002 seeking cancellation of a sale deed date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation and Cause of Action Are Triable Issues. Court holds that Order VII Rule 11 CPC application cannot be decided on disputed facts regarding knowledge of sale deeds and limitation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Application filed by Defendant No.15 (M/s. Mahabharat Builders) challenging the trial court's order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Commission's Compensation Award Against Builder for Delayed Possession in Housing Project. Builder's 'Endeavour' Clause Interpreted as Requiring Reasonable Efforts, and Contractual Compensation Rate Held Unfair Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a delayed housing project where the builder, NBCC (India) Limited, failed to hand over possession of a residential unit to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Eviction Decree in Favour of Court Receiver — Tenancy Rights Not Extinguished by Consent Terms. The Court held that the Court Receiver could not evict the defendants as trespassers without due process, as the consent terms did not terminate their tenancy rights.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 22nd February 2010 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court in S.C.Suit No.1154 of 2000, decreeing the...