Search Results for "gold clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "gold clause"

496 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 496 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Central Excise Appeal on Conditional Exemption and Cenvat Credit. The Appeal Raises Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Notification No.6/2006-C.E. and Credit on Aggregates Used in Export.

9 Sep 2014

The Bombay High Court heard a central excise appeal filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. against the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V. The appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Franchise Dispute — Upholds Award on Refund of Security Deposit and Interest but Sets Aside Award on Loss of Profit and Other Claims. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and damages were perverse and contrary to terms of franchise agreement.

14 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Kuoni Travels (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the development agreement did not grant possession.

4 Mar 2016

The appellants, Prajita Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 14.01.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Co...

High Court

Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.

29 Nov 2019

Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Application to Reject Suit Due to Arbitration Clause in Commercial Summary Suit. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Dec 2023

The Plaintiff, M/s Railsys Engineers Private Ltd., filed a commercial summary suit against the Defendants, Overseas Infrastructure Alliance Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantors — Personal Guarantee Not a 'Right or Interest in Property' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Guarantors Cannot Challenge Possession Notice Before Debt Recovery Tribunal Under SARFAESI; Remedy Lies Under RDDB Act, 1993.

10 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Mahindra Chandrasen and Sharad Chandrasen (petitioners) against Union Bank of India and other respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born After Cut-off Date — Government Resolution Clause E Held Inapplicable to Children Born Before 31.12.2001. The court interpreted Clause E of the Government Resolution dated 28.03.2001 as prospective, not disqualifying families with a third child born before 31.12.2001.

27 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Sunita Gaikwad (widow) and Ashish Gaikwad (son), sought compassionate appointment after the death of Dinesh Gaikwad, an employee of Z...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 23(5) of Income Tax Act, 1922 and 297(2)(g) and 271(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Against Double Taxation and Article 14 Challenges. Registered Firm’s Appeal Dismissed; Provisions on Double Taxation of Firm and Partners and Penalty Classification Held Valid.

18 Nov 1969

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a registered firm and its partners challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)