Search Results for "excise duty exemption"

276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Subsidy for Grain Alcohol Production Under GR Dated 08.06.2007. Petitioner Seeks Direction to Grant Special Subsidy/Incentive of Rs. 10 Per Bulk Litre and Quashing of Rejection Order Dated 24.11.2021.

The present writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under its civil appellate jurisdiction by Karan Distilleries Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Service Tax Case on Maintainability Grounds — Questions of Taxability and Valuation Fall Outside High Court's Jurisdiction Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate (appellant) filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of Shipping Bill from DEEC to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 requires prior denial of DEEC benefit by DGFT or Customs; mere inability to utilize advance license does not qualify.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Case — Conversion of DEEC Shipping Bill to Drawback Scheme Denied. CBEC Circular No. 4/2004 Mandates Prior Denial of DEEC Benefit by DGFT or Customs Authorities, Which Was Not Established.

The appellant, Manawat Plastics Pvt. Ltd., exported Woven PP Bags/Fabrics under three Shipping Bills dated 06.08.2002, 13.08.2002, and 16.09.2002 unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...