Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

586 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Denying Interim Protection Despite Registered Device Mark and Alleged Joint Use of the 'Kshetrapal' Mark.

The dispute centered on the use of the trademark 'Shree Kshetrapal' / 'Kshetrapal Construction' by two individuals in the construction business in Guj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'MAUJ' vs 'MOJ' — No Deceptive Similarity Found. Phonetic and structural comparison of marks 'MAUJ' and 'MOJ' held not deceptively similar; plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for interim relief.

The plaintiff, Mauj Mobile Private Limited, filed a commercial IP suit alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'MAUJ' (registered in Classes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Sales Tax Assessment on Inter-State Movement of Brahmos Missiles for Job Work. The Court Examines Whether Transfer of Goods for Warhead Integration Constitutes Inter-State Sale Under Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The judgment, though incomplete in its provided excerpt, deals with a writ petition filed by BrahMos Aerospace Private Limited, a joint venture betwee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Applications for Deletion of Defendants. The Court Examines Whether Directors and Former Employees Are Necessary Parties in a Suit for Breach of Contract Under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The matter concerns a writ petition filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...