Search Results for "detaining authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "detaining authority"

836 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 836 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Lack of Satisfying Material Renders Preventive Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority must consider all relevant facts, including the fact that the detenu was on bail, and failure to do so vitiates the detention order under Section 3(1) of MCOCA.

14 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Avinash Gopal Shilimkar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA) by an order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Constitute Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 for gambling do not affect public order, and delay in considering representation vitiates detention under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Accused in Gambling Cases — Acts Disruptive of Law and Order, Not Public Order. Offences under Section 65(D) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 and Section 12 of Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 do not affect public order as they are directed against individuals and do not disturb even tempo of community life.

6 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Jumma @ Munna Burhan Hiriwale, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Single Isolated Incident Without Satisfying 'Disturbed Area' Condition Under Section 2(a-1) of MPDA Act.

25 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Siddant alias Siddharth Sanjay Marathe, challenged a detention order dated 7 February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order Under PIT NDPS Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Live Link. Preventive detention order was invalid as detaining authority failed to consider bail status and relied on stale incidents without contemporary material showing continued prejudicial activity under Section 3(1) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988.

30 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Bail Orders and Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution and Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

1 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Ratnamala Mukund Balkhande, filed a criminal writ petition on behalf of her son, Sachin Mukund Balkhande, who was preventively detaine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and In-camera Statements Not Verified. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the detenu's bail status and to verify in-camera statements vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the MPDA Act.

17 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Pravin @ Bhayya Pratap Shinde, challenged a preventive detention order dated 06/09/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, un...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material of Detenue's Release on Bail in Similar Cases. The court held that non-placement of bail orders before the detaining authority vitiates the detention order under Section 3(1) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985.

25 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Shankara Gouda, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Ga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Communication of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Documents Relied Upon Were Not Supplied.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Shabbirbhai Bookwala, father of the detenu Mustafa Sabbirbhai Bookwala, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPID Act for Non-Supply of Vital Bail Documents. Failure to furnish bail application and order to detenu violated Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8(b) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

24 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Hemchand Somnath Gupta, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offender...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)