Search Results for "deadly weapon"

252 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anjalappa and Ashok, were convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in S.C. No.322/2012 for the murder of a person unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Petitioners/Accused Nos.5 and 6 Granted Regular Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307 r/w 149 IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Justice K. Somashekar, disposed of two connected criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Murder Case - Life Sentence Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed. Eye Witness Testimony and Recovery of Weapon Corroborate Prosecution Case, No Interference with Concurrent Findings.

The appellant, Kamlakar, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Dhammanand. The incident occurred on March 13, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Imprisonment Maintained Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Common Intention Established Under Section 34 IPC as Both Accused Participated in Assault with Shared Intent.

The appellants, Dattu Rama Theurkar and Deepak Dattu Theurkar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No.23 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nine Accused in Murder and Rioting Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 148, 302, 324 IPC for attacking complainant family with deadly weapons, resulting in one death and multiple injuries.

The case involves an appeal by nine accused persons against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, for offences under Sections 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed. Accused's Act of Stabbing Deceased Multiple Times After Trivial Quarrel Does Not Fall Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Narsinh Arjun Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Rajesh Kanojiya under Section 302 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner for Lack of Sufficient Material Under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Single Criminal Case and Stereotype In-Camera Statements Held Insufficient to Justify Draconian Restriction on Right to Move Freely.

The petitioner, Pramila Anand Sing, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-X, Mumbai, dated 2nd December 200...