Search Results for "conciliation under CPC"

507 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 507 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order Due to Insufficiently Stamped MOU. Application Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Not Maintainable as Underlying Agreement Was Insufficiently Stamped Under Section 35 of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2013 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Thane, allowing an application filed by the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Plaintiff to Adduce Evidence in Commercial Suit, Finding No Perversity or Jurisdictional Error. Order Passed Under Order 18 Rule 4(1B) CPC Not Violative of Embargo When Sufficient Cause Shown.

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit (Commercial O.S. No. 1/2018) filed by a Class-I contractor before the Commercial Court at Raichur aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Union of India's Revision in Arbitration Execution Case Due to Merger of Interim Award with Final Award. Interest Calculation Must Be Based on Final Award Under Section 31(7)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, owning South Western Railway, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Applications for Appointment of Arbitrator in Pending Suits Under Section 8 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies only before filing of first statement on substance of dispute, not to pending suits.

The petitioner, HMT Watches Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the Pr...