Search Results for "beneficiary hearing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "beneficiary hearing"

549 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG 2024 Exam Integrity, Finds No Systemic Leak or Malpractice. Court dismisses petitions for re-test, holding that isolated irregularities do not warrant cancellation of the entire examination under Article 226 of the Constitution.

2 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India dismissed a batch of petitions seeking cancellation and re-conduct of the NEET-UG 2024 examination, which was held on 5 May...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SRA Acquisition Notice for Church Land, Upholds Owner's Preferential Right to Redevelop Slum. The Court held that the owner of slum land has a preferential right to redevelop the land under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot acquire the land for a private developer without considering the owner's proposal.

11 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a public trust managing Mount Mary's Church in Bandra, Mumbai, owned land admeasuring 9371.30 sq. meters, out of which 1596.40 sq. met...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

23 Oct 2019

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes NAA Order Against McDonald's Franchisee in GST Anti-Profiteering Case — Failure to Consider Input Tax Credit Benefit and Lack of Proper Investigation. The court held that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority must consider the benefit of input tax credit and conduct a proper investigation before directing deposit of profiteered amount under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

1 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd., operates McDonald's restaurants in Western and Southern India. After the GST rate on restaurant serv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KIADB Land Acquisition Notification — Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Title or Possession Over Disputed Land. The court held that the petitioner, a company, had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition as it was neither the owner nor in possession of the land, and the notification under Section 28(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 was validly issued.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Engineering (Pvt) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.

12 Nov 2013

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Industrial Development Due to Non-Compliance with Section 28 of KIADB Act, 1966. Preliminary Notification Lapsed as Final Notification Not Issued Within Prescribed Period of Two Years.

26 Jun 2013

The petitioners, landowners from Gavenahalli Village, Hassan Taluk and District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

21 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)