Search Results for "back door appointments"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Part-Time Sweeper's Regularization Claim in Library Service — Appointment Not Against Sanctioned Post or Through Regular Recruitment. Part-time employees not recruited as per rules cannot claim regularization under Article 226 of Constitution of India, 1950.

The appellant, K. Velmurugan, was appointed as a part-time sweeper on 01.12.1999 on consolidated pay in the Tamil Nadu Public Libraries Department. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Petition Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Workers Entitled to Regularisation and Equal Pay for Same Work Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a Writ Petition filed by Solapur Mahanagarpalika (Municipal Corporation) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Zila Parishad in Regularization Case — Contractual Driver Not Entitled to Permanency Despite Long Service. Initial Appointment Was Temporary and Stopgap, No Right to Regularization Arises from Continued Engagement on Contractual Basis.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Thane, against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage

The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanent Absorption of Temporary Employee in University of Mumbai. Employer's Practice of Engaging Temporary Employees for Years Without Regularisation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The University of Mumbai (Petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th December 1999, which allowed a complaint filed by Shri S....