Search Results for "area parking plan"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 488 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 for Suit Alleging Violation of Byelaws and Infringement of Civil Rights.

The petitioner, Satish Trivedi, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, which decided a preliminar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Chief Minister's Permission for Development on Recreational Ground in Public Interest Litigation. Section 47 MRTP Act Appeal Allowed Without Proper Application of Mind and Contrary to Development Plan Reservation.

The judgment arises from a public interest litigation filed by residents living around the Cooperage plot in Mumbai, represented by the Oval Cooperage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Construction Dispute — No Sanction Order Existed, No Estoppel Against Corporation. Plaintiffs failed to prove deemed sanction under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 as no formal order was passed and no notice of revocation was issued.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, owned plot nos. 71/72, 70/2 and 70/3 on Sheet No. 67-D at Amravati. They filed Regular Civil Suit No. 193 of 1988...