Search Results for "appellate interference"

7671 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7671 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 31.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment in Tender Dispute Due to Absence of Concluded Contract. No Valid Arbitration Agreement Found as Letter of Intent Was Contingent on Formal Work Order Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), a state government electricity distribution utility, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular Second Appeals Challenging Dismissal of Suits for Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Court Delivers Judgment on Substantial Questions of Law Concerning Execution of Agreement of Sale, Possession, and Limitation.

These two regular second appeals arose from cross-suits concerning an agreement of sale dated 22.03.1985 over agricultural land bearing RS No. 17/1 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.

The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...