High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "agricultural lands"
2130 result(s) found
Found 2130 result(s)
High Court
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Agricultural Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Sale Deed Held Invalid as Tenant Was in Possession.
27 Nov 2014The petitioners, legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Agricultural Land Tribun...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases, Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Acquired Lands. Court holds that claimants are entitled to compensation based on market value determined by sale instances and potential of land, with statutory benefits under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
30 Nov -0001The present group of appeals arises from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Karanjwan Dam Project in Nashik. T...
- 107
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Tenancy Dispute, Upholding Protected Tenant's Ownership Rights. Oral Surrender of Protected Tenancy Rights Held Invalid Under Section 19 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, and Occupancy Rights Granted in 1982 Annulled as Ownership Had Already Vested in Protected Tenant Under Section 38-E from 1973.
1 Oct 2021The dispute concerned conflicting claims over agricultural land between the legal heirs of a purchaser and a protected tenant. The purchaser's predece...
- 254
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.
10 Mar 2016Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Appeals for Lack of Evidence and Limitation — Compensation Enhancement Denied Due to Failure to Prove Market Value and Delay in Filing Appeals.
15 Jun 2021The judgment pertains to a batch of appeals filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, against the judgment and award dated 06.04.2010 ...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.
13 Feb 2018The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Award for Highway Project Due to Incorrect Land Descriptions. Petitioners' lands were wrongly described in Section 3A and 3D notifications under the National Highways Act, 1956, leading to denial of opportunity to object and violation of principles of natural justice.
3 Aug 2023The petitioners, Govind Poslya Gavit and Vilas Vijaysing Valvi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition pr...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Maharashtra Land Ceiling Case — Partition Deed Prior to Cut-off Date Not Ignored Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Registered Partition Deed Dated 31.01.1970 Held Valid as It Was Executed Before 26.09.1970, Not Deemed to Avoid Ceiling Laws.
19 Feb 2020The appeal arose from a difference of opinion between two judges of the Supreme Court regarding the validity of a partition deed dated 31.01.1970 exec...
- 196
