Search Results for "additional benefits"

3694 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3694 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Law Case Over Resignation and Pension Benefits. Withdrawn Resignation Before Acceptance is Ineffective, and State Cannot Pass Successive Adverse Orders After Judicial Finality, Entitling Appellant to Pension Based on Minimum 25 Years Service Under Pension Rules.

The dispute involved an Auxiliary Nurse Midwife appointed in 1980 who submitted her resignation on 18 April 1993 but withdrew it on 23 November 1993 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Animal Husbandry Department Against Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits — Held That Pension Is Not a Bounty but a Right Earned by Service, and Denial Without Proper Justification Is Arbitrary.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the Commissioner of Animal Husbandry, Maharashtra, and other officers (petitioners) against three retir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Pension Case — Temporary Service Counted for Pension. Break in Service Does Not Forfeit Past Service Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu against a Single Judge order dated 18.03.2024, which directed the counting of temp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2012

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by former employees of National Organic Chemicals Ltd. (NOCIL) against Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. (n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioners' Writ Petitions for Full Pension Benefits Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Service Rules. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and cannot be withheld or reduced arbitrarily; respondents directed to pay full pension with interest.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, seeking full pension and pensionary benefits...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...