Search Results for "Sharad Birdhichand Sarda case"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inadmissible CCTV Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, 201, 212 and 120-B of IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Randeep Singh @ Rana and another appellant against their conviction for murder and related offences. The case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 328, 394 r/w 34 IPC.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai for offences under Sections 328, 302, and 394 read with Section 34 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Extra-Judicial Confession. The court confirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC as the chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Vishal Budhanand Thorat, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of his wife, Neelam, under Section 302 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Conspiracy Case Due to Non-Compliance with Investigation Duties and Lack of Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 25(1)(1b)(a) Arms Act Set Aside as Investigation Flawed and Conspiracy Charge Not Addressed While Co-Accused Acquitted.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by an appellant convicted for murder, destruction of evidence, and arms offenses, while other co-accused were a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Hostile Complainant and Lack of Evidence. State fails to prove charges under Sections 364-A, 386, 387 IPC as prosecution witnesses turned hostile and identification of accused was doubtful.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16/12/1999 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Rajendra Ronghe Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Pravin Tulsidas Kadu, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Rajendra Ronghe and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and Wife for Murder of Brother-in-Law Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of circumstances including last seen, motive, and recovery of weapon held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case involves two appeals filed by Khomu Kasar Bahadur Raul (appellant no.1) and Yeshori Keshav Bahadur Raul (appellant no.2), husband and wife, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Admissibility of Deceased Wife’s Statements in Abetment of Suicide Conviction Appeal. Statements Made in Prior Complaints and Police Report Held Admissible Under Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Despite Defence Challenge.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant (original accused No.1) by the Sessions Court for abetting the suicide of his wife and subjectin...