KAHC020054492024_1
26 Jul 2024The petitioner, Smt. Baligar Chandbi, was appointed as a contract Accountant at Raitha Samparka Kendra, Huvinahadagali, through an outsourcing agency ...
Search Results for "Security Services"
2185 result(s) found
Found 2185 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.
2 Jul 2026The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...
- 157
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Act — Use of Disjunctive 'or' in Detention Order Does Not Indicate Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the detaining authority's satisfaction was based on the cumulative effect of the detenu's activities, and the mere reproduction of statutory language does not render the order invalid.
2 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition challenging the preventive detention of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Fore...
- 952
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Mutual Legal Assistance and Ban on Proton Mail. Offensive Encrypted Emails Prompt Request for Court Intervention Under Information Technology Act, 2000 and Related Rules.
29 Apr 2025The petitioner, a company engaged in architecture and interior design, received abusive and sexually explicit emails from pseudonymous Proton Mail add...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitrator's Order under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding Dispute Over Refund of Security Deposit Arbitrable. Claim for Refund of Security Deposit Does Not Constitute 'Charges' under Section 41 of Presidency Town Small Causes Court Act, 1882, as It Is Not a Periodic Payment for Use and Occupation.
20 Sep 2017The petitioner, a banking company, entered into two agreements with the respondent for business centre facilities and support services at premises in ...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Free Legal Aid to Prison Inmates Under Article 21 and 39-A of the Constitution — Access to Justice for Indigent Prisoners is a Fundamental Right. The Court held that free legal assistance is a fundamental right even if not requested, and Magistrates must inform accused of this right.
4 Oct 2024The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by Suhas Chakma seeking directions to the Union of India, States, and Union T...
- 800
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Interim Injunction in Pledge Enforcement and Share Transfer Dispute — Application Seeks to Restrain Voting and Transfer Rights Over Pledged Shares. Pledgee Rights Under Section 176 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and SEBI Takeover Code Disclosure Obligations Are Central to Dispute.
4 Sep 2023The matter arose from Interim Application (L) No. 29574 of 2021 filed in Commercial Suit No. 189 of 2022 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
22 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...
- 667
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Security Deposit in Arbitration Dispute — Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited
1 Feb 2021The case involves two appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Essar House Private Limited and Essar Services ...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Insurance Deficiency — Bank Not Liable for Failure to Insure Hypothecated Assets Where Contract Imposed Primary Obligation on Borrower. The Court held that the bank's liberty to insure did not create a duty, and the borrower's indemnity clause shielded the bank from liability for uncovered losses.
20 May 2020The appellant, Canara Bank, had extended credit facilities to the respondent, Leatheroid Plastics Pvt. Ltd., since 1980. On 4th January 2001, the bank...
- 420
